<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tall Poppy Digital &#187; tips for the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/category/tips-tricks/tips-for-the-web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Spam in a can</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/spam-in-a-can</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/spam-in-a-can#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s Re-Captcha service is free, which is a lovely thing. It&#8217;ll help with all manner of things; we&#8217;ve just started using it on the Melbourne Genderqueer forums and hopefully this will help reduce the number of spambot signups they&#8217;re getting.</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/recaptcha" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s Re-Captcha </a>service is free, which is a lovely thing. It&#8217;ll help with all manner of things; we&#8217;ve just started using it on the Melbourne Genderqueer forums and hopefully this will help reduce the number of spambot signups they&#8217;re getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/spam-in-a-can/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Google Calendars onto WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/getting-google-calendars-onto-wordpress</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/getting-google-calendars-onto-wordpress#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem: Facebook events had to be manually added to google calendar, which was then added via plugin to a website I maintain.</p> <p>The calendar ALSO didn&#8217;t display anything but the one google calendar, and there were several being subscribed to.</p> Get a google calendar account and add the events <p>1. get a google calendar <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/getting-google-calendars-onto-wordpress">Getting Google Calendars onto WordPress</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem: Facebook events had to be manually added to google calendar, which was then added via plugin to a website I maintain.</p>
<p>The calendar ALSO didn&#8217;t display anything but the one google calendar, and there were several being subscribed to.</p>
<h3>Get a google calendar account and add the events</h3>
<p>1. <a href="http://calendar.google.com" target="_blank">get a google calendar account</a></p>
<p>2. use this procedure to <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/15/how-to-sync-facebook-events-with-google-calendar/" target="_blank">link the facebook events to google calendar</a></p>
<p><strong>Note</strong>: Don&#8217;t log out for now!</p>
<h3>Install and configure google calendar events</h3>
<p>1. log into your wordpress site</p>
<p>2. install the <a href="http://www.rhanney.co.uk/plugins/google-calendar-events/" target="_blank">google calendar events widget</a></p>
<p>3. under <strong>Settings</strong> &gt; <strong>Google Calendar Events</strong>, click <strong>Add Feed</strong></p>
<p>4. add your feed title (eg. my facebook events)</p>
<p>5. in <strong>Google calendar</strong>, under <strong>Other Calendars</strong>, click the calendar you want to add, and in the sub-menu, click Calendar Settings</p>
<p>6. in the <strong>Calendar settings</strong> page, at the bottom click the <strong>XML</strong> link, and copy the text there.</p>
<p>7. back in your wordpress install, in the <strong>Add Feed</strong> page, into the <strong>Feed URL</strong> paste the XML link</p>
<p>8. Click <strong>Add Feed</strong>.</p>
<p>9. In the <strong>Google Calendar Events</strong> page, take note of the feed ID (it will be 1, 2 or whatever)</p>
<p><strong>NOTE</strong>: repeat this process for each calendar you want to have displayed on your site.</p>
<h3>Add the widget to your site sidebar</h3>
<p>1. In the left sidebar, click Appearance &gt; Widgets</p>
<p>2. In the Widgets page, in Available Widgets, drag and drop Google Calendar Events to your sidebar</p>
<p>3. In the Google Calendar Events widget, enter the ID of your feed (from the Google Calendar Events page). You can add others, separated by a comma</p>
<p>4. Enter the title of the widget (eg. events), and choose how you want it to display (eg. grid).</p>
<p>5. click <strong>save</strong>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/getting-google-calendars-onto-wordpress/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep things simple</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/keep-things-simple</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/keep-things-simple#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>More and more I see websites that you have to dig for information. You click a button that&#8217;s clearly named to give you the hope of more information, and you end up on another general page which doesn&#8217;t have what you&#8217;re looking for,</p> <p>So you click again, and the same thing happens.</p> <p>Rinse and repeat.</p> <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/keep-things-simple">Keep things simple</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more I see websites that you have to dig for information. You click a button that&#8217;s clearly named to give you the hope of more information, and you end up on another general page which doesn&#8217;t have what you&#8217;re looking for,</p>
<p>So you click again, and the same thing happens.</p>
<p>Rinse and repeat.</p>
<p>The most important things to give people on your website are:</p>
<p>- who you are and what you do &#8212; a homepage that&#8217;s simple and clearly written.</p>
<p>- how to get in contact with you &#8212; either on the homepage, or on a single, easy to access contact page.</p>
<p>- relevant information, easy to get at &#8212; either at a top level or one level beneath.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it. Simple wins on the internet. It might seem logical to put information in level after level, deeper and deeper so it&#8217;s organised correctly, and in an office environment (perhaps) this works well. It doesn&#8217;t work online.</p>
<p>Examples of buried information:</p>
<h3>Lifeline service finder</h3>
<p><a href="http://lifeline.org.au" target="_blank">http://lifeline.org.au</a></p>
<p>- Click Find Help</p>
<p>- Click Lifeline Service Finder</p>
<p>- Click Lifeline&#8217;s Service Finder</p>
<p>- Now enter what you&#8217;re looking for in the two fields</p>
<p>To improve this, at the very least, the two search fields should be made available on the second page, not the third. Better still would be to make them available on the Find Help page. And the best way would be to simply have a drop-menu from the Find Help main menu item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/keep-things-simple/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>making phone numbers clickable</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/making-phone-numbers-clickable</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/making-phone-numbers-clickable#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips & tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On a lot of mobile phones with touch-screens (iphone, etc), you&#8217;re able to tap on a phone number on a website to dial that number.</p> <p>Some numbers don&#8217;t get recognised however &#8211; 13 numbers for example.</p> <p>Thanks to Jennifer at Scriptygoodness.com, there&#8217;s a solution: it&#8217;s a hyperlink with a difference. Click to read more about <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/making-phone-numbers-clickable">making phone numbers clickable</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a lot of mobile phones with touch-screens (iphone, etc), you&#8217;re able to tap on a phone number on a website to dial that number.</p>
<p>Some numbers don&#8217;t get recognised however &#8211; 13 numbers for example.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/06/14/make-phone-numbers-clickable-to-dial-on-mobile-phones/" target="_blank">Thanks to Jennifer at Scriptygoodness.com, there&#8217;s a solution: it&#8217;s a hyperlink with a difference. Click to read more about making phone numbers clickable!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/making-phone-numbers-clickable/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you shouldn&#8217;t use Facebook for personal stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/why-you-shouldnt-use-facebook-for-personal-stuff</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/why-you-shouldnt-use-facebook-for-personal-stuff#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>I wrote this email to some friends about Facebook versus a personal password-protected website for photos and personal stuff. Thought it might be of use to others</p> <p>Just wanted to write some things about Facebook.</p> <p>First, putting photos onto Facebook is really dangerous as it regularly changes security settings without telling anyone. In the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/why-you-shouldnt-use-facebook-for-personal-stuff">Why you shouldn&#8217;t use Facebook for personal stuff</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>I wrote this email to some friends about Facebook versus a personal password-protected website for photos and personal stuff. Thought it might be of use to others</p>
<p>Just wanted to write some things about Facebook.</p>
<p>First, putting photos onto Facebook is really dangerous as it regularly changes security settings without telling anyone. In the last 5 years, Facebook security has been regularly downgraded and people have had to make serious effort to lock their profiles down again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-timeline" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-timeline</a></p>
<p><a href="http://flowingdata.com/2010/05/07/evolution-of-facebook-privacy-policies/" target="_blank">http://flowingdata.com/2010/05/07/evolution-of-facebook-privacy-policies/</a> &#8211; a graphical representation of the EFF link above</p>
<p>The April incident where they implemented a service called &#8220;Social Graph&#8221; meant that everyone&#8217;s profiles were open to the world. The idea from Facebook was so that you could be found anywhere easily and simply, your identity could be shared with &#8220;3rd party providers&#8221; (that they had deals with) to advertise at you. Supposedly this meant you could just log in with your FB profile information and this would make things easier. In reality it meant everyone had to scramble to lock their profiles down from prying eyes.</p>
<p><a href="http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/04/23/facebook-privacy-how-to-secure-your-profile-from-the-social-graph/" target="_blank">http://geekshuiliving.com/2010/04/23/facebook-privacy-how-to-secure-your-profile-from-the-social-graph/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.backupify.com/2010/05/17/the-problem-with-facebooks-open-graph-isnt-privacy-its-security/" target="_blank">http://blog.backupify.com/2010/05/17/the-problem-with-facebooks-open-graph-isnt-privacy-its-security/</a></p>
<p>Further, With Facebook, you might be able to lock your profile down, but you also have to consider the profiles of your friends &#8212; if they&#8217;re not locked down as tightly as yours, or if they&#8217;ve got apps which can see their profiles then there&#8217;s a security issue there too.</p>
<p>Apps are a problem. Any time you use one, you&#8217;re giving free access to your entire profile to a third party. There are no guarantees what they do with this information.</p>
<p>Last, Facebook owns EVERYTHING you post on their site. You can&#8217;t ask for your profile to be truly removed from their servers &#8212; you can only get it turned off.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20004511-83.html" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20004511-83.html</a></p>
<p>Photos are the same:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-keeps-deleted-user-photos-for-years-20101013-16j1x.html" target="_blank">The Age, 13 October 2010 &#8211; Facebook keeps photos</a></p>
<p>The advantage you have with a website is that you can lock it completely down. No-one can see anything without the appropriate password. You own the content and you control who can go in and out. And if things go badly or something odd happens, you can take it down completely.</p>
<p>You can also implement a feature called &#8220;nofollow&#8221; which means the site won&#8217;t be included in search &#8212; Ultimately, however, google needs to see the site and the text on the site to index (include the site in search results) which is impossible if it&#8217;s password protected as soon as you arrive and the site won&#8217;t even display without the appropriate username and password.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that on the web, it being an &#8220;information superhighway&#8221;, it is actually possible to run across the road without being hit &#8212; you just have to be very wary of the way you do it, otherwise it&#8217;s all-over!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/why-you-shouldnt-use-facebook-for-personal-stuff/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating your own Favicon in Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/creating-your-own-favicon-in-photoshop</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/creating-your-own-favicon-in-photoshop#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Favicon is the little icon that appears next to a website address in the website address bar &#8211; up there at the top of your browser. It is literally a tiny little image that&#8217;s dropped into the html folder of your website, or if you want to be neater, an image subfolder. The code at <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/creating-your-own-favicon-in-photoshop">Creating your own Favicon in Photoshop</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Favicon is the little icon that appears next to a website address in the website address bar &#8211; up there at the top of your browser. It is literally a tiny little image that&#8217;s dropped into the <strong>html</strong> folder of your website, or if you want to be neater, an image subfolder. The code at the back end of your site, between the &#8220;head&#8221; and &#8220;/head&#8221; tags will have the following:</p>
<pre style="font: normal normal normal 12px/18px Consolas, Monaco, 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 10px; overflow-x: auto; overflow-y: hidden; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: #eeeeee; font-size: 11px; clear: both; border: 1px solid #666666;">&lt;link rel="shortcut icon" href="/path/to/your/favicon.ico" /&gt;</pre>
<p>where /path/to/your/favicon.ico is a real set of folders. In many cases you won&#8217;t need that part anyway, just the favicon.ico.</p>
<div id="attachment_459" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 182px"><a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-3.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-459" title="favicon" src="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-3.png" alt="The Apple website favicon" width="172" height="46" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Apple website favicon</p></div>
<p>It&#8217;s a neat idea, that&#8217;s supported by all the browsers and goes a little way to making your website look a little more &#8220;professional&#8221;</p>
<p>There are several sites where you can create your own and even upload your images.</p>
<p>A couple of online generators are:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://tools.dynamicdrive.com/favicon/" target="_blank">Dynamic Drive Favicon generator</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.favicon.cc/" target="_blank">Favicon.cc</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The problem with these is that they&#8217;re a little hit-and-miss with the resolutuon (that is, they look blocky when you do it).</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got Photoshop, then you can create better favicons, with a little help from the open source community.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/jennifer/favicon.html" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s instructions on how to create favicons in Photoshop, at Photoshop support</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraphics.com.au/sw/" target="_blank">Here is where you download and instructions to install the Photoshop ico file format plugin at telegraphics</a></p>
<p>The story here is ultimately when you&#8217;re dealing with graphics, design big, then make it smaller! The higher the DPI (Dots Per Inch) the better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/creating-your-own-favicon-in-photoshop/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone icons</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/iphone-icons</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/iphone-icons#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips for iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you own an iPhone you might have noticed that if you add a website to the home screen, some appear with neat icons and some just display a representation of the page you were on.</p> <p>It&#8217;s actually rather simple to get a neat icon for your website to appear on the iPhone, and it <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/iphone-icons">iPhone icons</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you own an iPhone you might have noticed that if you add a website to the home screen, some appear with neat icons and some just display a representation of the page you were on.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually rather simple to get a neat icon for your website to appear on the iPhone, and it looks great for potential customers too!</p>
<p>All you need to do is create an image in your favourite image editing programme, say Photoshop, Gimp, Image editor or whatever you happen to use.</p>
<p>You create it to the following dimensions:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">width: 45px</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">height: 45px</p>
<p>Then you save it as a Portable Network Graphic (PNG) with the following name:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">apple-touch-icon.png</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve done that, upload the file with FTP or any other file transfer programme to the root folder of your website. This will be called something like html or your website name.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s it! When someone chooses to add your website to the home screen (in the Safari browser, click the + and select Add to Home Screen), there will be your neat icon waiting there for them! You don&#8217;t have to do anything but create your icon, the iPhone makes the corners curved and gives it the 3d effect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/iphone-icons/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mailing lists versus social networking: the new web</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/mailing-lists-versus-social-networking-the-new-web</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/mailing-lists-versus-social-networking-the-new-web#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for your mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for your PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Buzzwords ahoy!</p> <p>I&#8217;m a hip and with-it computer internet person; running a business that is all about the web, you have to be!</p> <p>Mailing lists are old favourites on the web and are based on the assumption that people like to receive email messages with information in them, be they specials you&#8217;re offering, general information <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/mailing-lists-versus-social-networking-the-new-web">mailing lists versus social networking: the new web</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzzwords ahoy!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a hip and with-it computer internet person; running a business that is all about the web, you have to be!</p>
<p>Mailing lists are old favourites on the web and are based on the assumption that people like to receive email messages with information in them, be they specials you&#8217;re offering, general information or even changes to your class timetables.</p>
<p>They do work, but the problem is that they need content, and content takes time to write in a single sitting. They&#8217;re also dependent upon you being able to schedule things in advance and can sometimes be a little late to market.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why more and more, people online are relying on different means to convey their message quickly and with a minimum of fuss.</p>
<p>These alternate means are broadly described using the buzzword &#8220;social networking&#8221;.</p>
<p>Social networking is one of the more recent internet buzzwords and is a term used for what people do naturally anyway &#8211; talk to one-another.</p>
<p>The difference on the web is only the method. Rather than chatting with a phone call (arguably the first electronic social-networking) people do it with instant messengers, applications like blogger, twitter or other similar applications.</p>
<p>Basically, all &#8220;social networking&#8221; is about is communicating with other people, either one-on-one or as a group (one to many), but doing it electronically.</p>
<p>The bottom-line here though is that it&#8217;s nothing new, and nothing particularly to be confused about. Like I say, we&#8217;ve been doing this for a while now, just in different ways.</p>
<h2>Instant Messaging</h2>
<p>Instant Messengers are the rough equivalent of the phone call just with a keyboard typing the message rather than you saying the words yourself. Sure, you can add people to the conversation, but you can do that with a conference call can&#8217;t you? Applications like <a href="http://windowslive.com/Desktop/messenger" target="_blank">Microsoft Messenger for PC and Mac</a>, <a href="http://skype.com/" target="_blank">Skype (which also does video calls, which is another subject for another time)</a> and <a href="http://adium.im/" target="_blank">Adium for Mac</a> will handle all manner of different one-to-one systems. Adium for my money is one of the nicer systems for the mac, and can handle any account, from MS Messenger, Google Messenger and others. A beta is out at the moment which handles Twitter (albeit rather oddly, but that&#8217;s what you get in beta, almost ready but still incomplete code).</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_messaging" target="_blank">You can read more about the various Instant Messaging here on Wikipedia!</a></p>
<h2>Blogging and Microblogging</h2>
<p>Blogging is effectively the diary but put online for all to see (or if you want to be cagey, you can lock things away from prying eyes. Childrens photos are a big candidate for the lock and key because, unfortunately, if you can see a photo, you can download it with a simple right click command).</p>
<p>Blogging has been around since the early days of the net, and some sites are still running.</p>
<p>Effectively blogging gives a voice to your opinions, and they&#8217;re being used for many different purposes, including simple venting to information. The movie Julie/Julia started life as a blog, then became a book before hollywood took it on.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blogging" target="_blank">Read more about blogging here at Wikipedia</a></p>
<p>Microblogging is ultimately the same as blogging, but with the restriction of less characters to type. Tools like <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> have a limit of 140 characters, which has meant people who use it need to get to the point as fast as possible. As a distribution medium for additional information which can be accessed with a click of a hyperlink, it&#8217;s quite neat and there are several tools (including <a href="http://tinyurl.com" target="_blank">tinyurl</a>)which you can use which automatically shorten your addresses &#8211; <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/" target="_blank">tweetdeck for the mac</a> and <a href="http://www.tweet-r.com/" target="_blank">Tweetr</a> are but two of such applications, but there&#8217;s a bunch of them for all the different microblogging systems out there.</p>
<h2>Facebook, MySpace and LinkedIn</h2>
<p>Large-scale &#8220;social networking&#8221; systems are available online for whomever wants to use them. They offer a complete ecosystem, effectively a web within a web, where people can search on your name or business, link with your profile and become a &#8220;friend&#8221;, and exchange information.</p>
<p><a href="http://facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://myspace.com" target="_blank">MySpace</a> are more for personal social networking, while <a href="http://linkedin.com" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a> is dedicated to so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; associations, but there&#8217;s no reason why you can&#8217;t do both using Facebook. Indeed, Facebook&#8217;s user-base is far in excess of LinkedIn and has far more features.</p>
<p>MySpace, even though it is said to have &#8220;lost&#8221; the Social Networking wars (and I&#8217;ll state for the record, that it&#8217;s become exceedingly boring to describe everything as a &#8220;war&#8221;) but is still used almost exclusively for musicians and bands. Arguably, the only reason Facebook won through was because their user interface (what you see on the screen) was less bad than that of MySpace.</p>
<h2>Why use them?</h2>
<p>The question is, why is using instant messenging, blogging and microblogging a substitute for an email?</p>
<p>Overall, we&#8217;re talking about distribution and speed.</p>
<p>With a mailing list, only the people who are members of your list can get the goodies you&#8217;re offering. This works for some marketing models, but increasingly (and aligned with the overall open dissemination of information online) are less and less effective to get your message out quickly. The Iranian elections are a perfect example of how fast information can travel with only a 140 character limit.</p>
<p>With some clever and regular posts to your Twitter, Facebook or your blog, you can reach far more people than with a locked-down email message. The web can be used to work for your business, indeed, it&#8217;s something overlooked by many people online: the website you have designed can work for you, not just be an online business card.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s a catch: like everything online, you have to make it relevant. Your information needs to speak to your market, and to communicate information that people need to hear. This is what Search Engines use when determining where you appear in their results. It&#8217;s all about content. And hiding your content away in a locked-down email message won&#8217;t help you reach more people.</p>
<p>For example, the tweets (that&#8217;s the term for the messages you send using Twitter) that you&#8217;ll find at <a href="http://twitter.com/tallpoppy" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/tallpoppy</a> are almost completely dedicated to web and the technologies we&#8217;re working with. The personal twitter account is hidden from prying eyes (but as a result of the number of tweets and the subjects I write upon, draw just as many spammers as does the professional account)!</p>
<p>The information we post on the Tall Poppy blogs, found on our site, are dedicated to keeping our visitors up-to-date with web-related information and technology, with the once weekly status report on what we&#8217;re doing, just to prove we&#8217;re humans and not spambots!</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s the point of difference that you should aim at if you choose to take any of these new technologies up: make it human, make it real. By doing that you become your own representative on the web, and people like talking to people; we&#8217;re all voyers online and hearing positive stories about businesses doing great work means you&#8217;ll start to attract people you&#8217;d like to do business with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/mailing-lists-versus-social-networking-the-new-web/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 100 websites</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/top-100-websites</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/top-100-websites#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today in The Guardian online there is a report on their top 100 websites, with some analysis of the winners and losers this year:</p> <p>100 essential websites</p> <p>It makes for interesting reading, especially the part how Twitter has effectively steamrolled the opposition and now has become, in my opinion, the tool of choice for citizen-journalists <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/top-100-websites">Top 100 websites</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today in The Guardian online there is a report on their top 100 websites, with some analysis of the winners and losers this year:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/09/best-websites-internet" target="_blank">100 essential websites</a></p>
<p>It makes for interesting reading, especially the part how Twitter has effectively steamrolled the opposition and now has become, in my opinion, the tool of choice for citizen-journalists (remember the Iranian elections?), and Google and Microsoft have cottoned-onto this and are now using Tweets in their search results which is a big change.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an opinion on Twitter and the concept of citizen journalism: rather than hindering and misinforming, slowly it will help journalism as a whole as verifiable stories will be easier to find, and nothing is better than getting information from the people on the ground.</p>
<p>And the more information that comes from those closest to problems that are occurring, the better things could conceivably get. Certainly you have to be cautious with information online, but if enough people speak on the same topic and convey the same information, you&#8217;ve got cause for thought and the information to act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/top-100-websites/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Website Design</title>
		<link>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/website-design</link>
		<comments>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/website-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for your mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/website-design</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Finally Ready! Google releases Chrome for Mac and Linux </p> Chrome has been out at least a year for the PC, but unfortunately for us on the Mac (and Linux by default) there hasn&#8217;t been anything to use but the rather good Safari or the (in my opinion) slightly disappointing Firefox. I say disappointing <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/website-design">Website Design</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">It&#8217;s Finally Ready!
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/computers/google-releases-chrome-for-macs-linux-20091209-kihn.html">Google releases Chrome for Mac and Linux</a>
</p>
<div>Chrome has been out at least a year for the PC, but unfortunately for us on the Mac (and Linux by default) there hasn&#8217;t been anything to use but the rather good Safari or the (in my opinion) slightly disappointing <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html">Firefox</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>I say disappointing with regard to Firefox because, as a web designer, I have to be able to test web pages. And unfortunately to-date, Firefox has a page reload issue which leads to misinformation. An example: I make a change in the code of the website, go to Firefox to test it, reload the page (shift-refresh) and there&#8217;s no change. So I try another change and test it out and there&#8217;s still no change that I can see.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Well, actually there is. It&#8217;s just the browser doesn&#8217;t accept a forced reload of the page. It relies on the cached version. So it displays the version of the page that&#8217;s in memory rather than retrieving a new one. Even if I&#8217;m testing locally.</div>
<div></div>
<div>This is fine for the majority of people, and Firefox is still an improvement in security and a number of other features on most web browsers. Unfortunately it led to many hours of hair-pulling and frustration for this little black duck.&nbsp;</div>
<div></div>
<div>I stuck with Firefox because of <a href="http://getfirebug.com/">the rather good &#8220;Firebug&#8221; plugi</a>n, which meant I could look at the underlying code of the site. But once <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/Safari_3.1_The_Magical_Develop_Menu/">I was told about the developer settings in Safari</a>, I moved over and haven&#8217;t looked back.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So in short, I&#8217;ll be downloading a copy of Chrome, but it won&#8217;t be the browser-o-choice for most tasks. It&#8217;ll be a testing ground.</div>
<div></div>
<div>But, I hear you say, what about PC browsers and the heinous Internet Explorer 6?</div>
<div></div>
<div>I&#8217;ve tried VNC Fusion and even Parallels (and Virtual PC on the old mac G4 hardware) and they&#8217;re all astonishingly resource-hungry. As a virtualisation system, they&#8217;re rather good, but you need licensed copies of Windows and an individual windows install for each version of Internet Explorer and a cartload of memory so you can run them.</div>
<div></div>
<div>This is the equivalent of a badly run car: a hole to throw memory into.&nbsp;</div>
<div></div>
<div>So as an alternative, I have a licensed copy of the <a href="http://www.winehq.org/">WINE</a> port (haha, couldn&#8217;t resist) <a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/">Codeweavers Crossover Mac</a> (there&#8217;s one for Linux too). This will run individual copies of Internet Explorer on their own, no OS needed.&nbsp;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Yes, it costs me a little money, but it&#8217;s worth every penny (and it&#8217;s cheaper by far than the alternatives above).</div>
<div></div>
<div>For a quick look at a website, I use the rather good <a href="http://browsershots.org/">browsershots projec</a>t. This lists every browser known to humanity (and some I&#8217;ve never heard of) and you can click the box, enter your website URL and see what it looks like.</div>
<div></div>
<div>There&#8217;s a limit to how many you can test against in one 24 hour period of course, so I am sparing with this, but for the major browsers on windows (IE 6-8) it works a treat. And if you want to use more, you can buy a monthly pass.&nbsp;</div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tallpoppydigital.com/website-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

